Log in
or
Join
.
Web
|
Video
|
Texts
|
Audio
|
Projects
|
About
|
Account
|
TVNews
About TV
Help
Feedback
Sort:
Relevance
Most Recent
Oldest
More search options
Search just the current recording:
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
contains
does not contain
Network:
Station:
Program Title:
Language:
Chinese
English
Esperanto
Filipino
French
Hebrew
Korean
Spanish
Date Range:
From:
To:
BORROW
BROADCAST SUMMARY
SHARE CLIP
Simply click and copy the url below to share this clip:
SFGTV2 SITE
00:00
If you
log in
or
join us
, you could
Add a Comment
Cancel
00:00
0
said:
BORROW
copyrighted work
SFGTV2
November 22, 2012 3:30am-4:00am PST on
SFGTV2
0 comments
Clips viewed 29 times
Extracted Topics
us
7
neuroscience
3
kansas
2
jodie foster
1
hendricks
1
justin
1
george
1
reagan
1
jim miller
1
hinckley
1
brad
1
ken
1
new mexico
1
mexico
1
virginia
1
vanderbilt
1
hallucinations
1
adolescence
1
anthony hopkins
1
Broadcast Summary
00:00
got
conquer
unite
everybody
contact
call
commander
together
based
community
wanted
engagements
question
force
organization
task
applause
next
speaking
ask
speak
00:30
effort
right
community
idea
something
miller
formalize
jim
relationship
place
organization
based
talked
01:00
important
training
successes
yearly
quarterly
specific
guidelines
thank
understand
question
individuals
evaluate
criteria
cbos
last
basis
01:30
try
opportunities
job
funding
create
currently
internship
creative
types
many
programs
youth
risk
reduced
available
right
02:00
youth
infuse
choice
programs
education
utilize
political
identified
confuse
oasis
trying
western
ways
lot
02:30
opportunities
number
security
requires
required
everybody
many
internship
permits
alternative
social
pathways
03:00
mayor
youth
commitment
employment
opportunity
determination
use
help
self
hope
path
kids
many
thank
venues
employ
program
reflect
choices
leading
positive
possible
something
03:30
applause
short
panelists
introduce
today
structured
ask
neuroscience
round
presentation
topic
panel
04:00
study
different
questions
members
scientist
brain
scientists
studied
kind
invitation
thank
introduction
narrow
row
applause
much
04:30
illness
personality
psychiatric
individuals
neuroscience
understanding
iq
buy
brad
named
might
terms
offer
oddly
mental
normal
client
worked
history
studying
problems
divorced
different
disorders
remarried
05:00
sex
started
unconscious
correctional
neurological
schoolteacher
16
hit
ago
high
head
kind
last
years
using
women
drive
events
worked
working
knocked
parlors
reports
officer
massage
internet
conceals
migraines
following
soliciting
pornography
05:30
sexual
behavior
treatment
diagnosed
chemically
stepdaughter
mom
try
home
find
2010
brad
wrong
child
feels
found
makes
reduce
subtle
guilty
legally
picture
removed
advances
laughter
castrated
pedophile
06:00
rehab
starts
chooses
addiction
clients
sex
bedwetting
night
headache
molestation
sexual
inappropriate
sent
facility
jail
brad
solicit
complains
goes
prison
staff
06:30
tumor
related
send
behavior
mri
question
average
aberrant
tomorrow
started
looks
another
07:00
eighth
aces
arrested
course
problems
another
takes
behavior
defender
dealing
types
different
wife
recovered
started
order
returned
memory
mri
public
07:30
activities
types
relevant
night
involved
school
sporting
tumor
16
mitigation
social
sentencing
iq
done
child
average
talk
high
guess
08:00
head
laughter
something
attempted
prosecution
possibility
mug
isn
shot
ends
seek
coma
hits
life
fight
injury
murder
justin
weapon
parole
another
friends
without
serious
charged
sentence
teenager
08:30
court
supreme
eliminated
possibility
adolescents
neuroscience
12
old
year
2009
life
this
cited
brain
cases
sided
maybe
talked
parole
without
sentence
homicide
develops
adolescent
09:00
watch
making
scan
25
supreme
order
picture
court
24
parents
start
decision
went
used
adolescence
brain
mature
need
hit
poor
09:30
changes
decision
decisions
associated
composition
development
iq
ok
55
old
low
year
make
nice
jail
male
named
white
world
george
client
process
another
history
offender
10:00
iq
low
prosecution
george
arrested
iqs
retarded
allowed
individuals
murder
72
seeking
refer
death
supreme
penalty
court
might
10:30
gray
matter
george
neuroscience
quick
analysis
older
bad
laughter
kidding
gets
goes
execute
tell
enough
anything
high
news
11:00
blue
brain
areas
aging
seeing
showing
bottom
computer
older
gray
slice
matter
11:30
iq
gray
turns
matter
correlated
relationship
age
show
need
find
maps
test
type
nice
color
brain
highly
images
measure
showing
changes
beautiful
depending
particular
12:00
iq
tell
reagan
hinckley
tried
old
president
year
future
assassinate
isn
neuroscience
neat
likely
26
near
anyone
exactly
actual
male
able
12:30
used
images
called
delusions
case
pled
affection
psychotic
something
voices
tried
hallucinations
insanity
foster
jodie
support
diagnosis
gain
heard
13:00
insane
develop
2009
starting
types
risk
illnesses
thousand
sentenced
asylum
2010
diagnostic
managed
information
factor
found
treated
released
faster
based
likely
13:30
different
schizophrenia
told
happen
much
show
pretend
faster
certainty
99
hallucinations
areas
brain
voices
hear
away
14:00
illness
area
much
engaged
different
tell
schizophrenia
blue
bipolar
lot
common
might
physicians
map
14:30
legal
system
inform
scanners
decisions
support
difference
psychiatrists
able
illness
things
mri
client
instead
mental
used
15:00
different
brain
behavior
women
telling
completely
hopkins
difference
mris
capable
guy
gender
anthony
men
15:30
study
individuals
spousal
extremely
appreciate
profound
later
understand
interpretation
manifest
let
really
callous
inability
people
score
16:00
many
remorse
defendant
almost
sometimes
feel
television
equation
psychopath
least
everyone
asked
solve
answer
question
right
done
feels
16:30
giving
hospital
people
touch
hopefully
granted
transport
feel
nanosecond
ability
psychopathy
lab
individuals
lacked
present
things
study
17:00
trailer
really
nice
mexico
inmates
studies
force
psychopathic
better
high
straights
score
mri
volunteer
third
laughter
built
individuals
traits
found
live
17:30
towards
area
structure
pretty
terms
extremely
reduced
gray
important
things
mitigation
average
guy
individuals
areas
environments
density
different
control
tumor
matter
18:00
used
research
treatment
attention
information
individuals
tax
lot
dole
kick
data
thank
start
happy
helped
health
answer
funded
seminar
dollars
thought
national
questions
18:30
questions
ask
debate
actually
trying
turn
smart
applause
amongst
moderator
hoping
thank
intelligent
educate
talk
talking
wanting
rather
people
19:00
free
start
david
individual
definition
consciously
ok
ask
idea
last
punt
right
today
terms
spent
night
expert
doctor
system
choose
justice
context
actually
criminal
debating
19:30
free
question
mean
really
science
operationally
ask
side
legal
might
mainly
system
define
concept
measure
whether
debating
laughter
scientist
unhelpful
construct
standpoint
perspective
20:00
many
control
measure
scientists
impulsivity
distinguish
put
ken
free
wait
mean
newer
basic
chris
asked
anita
exactly
impulse
problem
anything
including
something
colleague
emotional
vanderbilt
20:30
competency
law
choose
impulse
multifaceted
irresistible
area
gray
legal
basic
might
really
ability
example
actually
studying
develops
resisted
concepts
recognize
construct
difficult
interested
scientists
perspective
21:00
competency
commit
decision
question
participate
voluntarily
ask
law
free
many
mean
apply
crime
means
thing
mental
things
measure
somehow
whether
executed
abortion
hospital
scientist
different
contribute
21:30
mean
legal
idea
free
systems
operationally
big
much
part
side
often
plays
really
define
actual
control
measure
factual
someone
debates
actually
referred
scientist
construct
volitional
empirically
22:00
free
start
actually
believing
conclusion
responsibility
law
mean
saying
choice
action
somehow
measure
premise
problem
criminal
rhetoric
concluded
therefore
conscious
essentially
consequences
22:30
law
call
free
civil
criminal
commitment
high
area
used
today
value
starts
notion
control
classic
violent
happens
profile
example
bleeding
sexually
thequasi
somebody
judgment
generally
predators
volitional
normatively
responsibility
23:00
supreme
violent
civilly
sexually
demonstrate
constitution
versus
kansas
commit
lack
court
crane
order
control
defined
factual
predator
decisions
hendricks
predators
criminally
constructs
volitional
independent
legislatively
23:30
likely
future
violent
disorder
construct
personality
lack
anti
find
gets
side
civil
least
often
prove
using
mental
second
control
factual
however
actually
judgments
volitional
empirically
abnormality
24:00
fact
finder
defined
whether
calling
volitional
lack
re
jury
never
judge
using
control
abnormal
actually
judgment
mentally
violating
provisions
substantial
potentially
normatively
essentially
constitution
operationally
24:30
control
past
badly
behavior
testify
basically
today
based
volitional
tomorrow
likely
lacks
behaved
matter
fact
factual
therefore
expert
lack
able
define
25:00
factual
scientists
volitional
understand
definition
essentially
bad
act
past
acts
part
realm
legal
second
deeply
define
control
clauses
concern
problem
consider
original
punishing
construct
violation
inability
25:30
chocolate
hand
cake
right
raise
considerations
set
add
let
bit
law
sort
free
left
civil
based
start
value
people
little
define
matter
making
measure
shorter
question
audience
decisions
everybody
normative
professor
commitment
26:00
many
hand
cake
right
people
preferences
act
feel
free
left
raise
acted
hands
great
found
simple
choice
control
concept
ability
desires
thought
decided
difficult
chocolate
consistent
26:30
may
cake
chocolate
preference
personality
predispositions
23
ok
anti
free
talk
right
often
sugar
hands
raise
fewer
things
either
social
desires
profile
whether
conflate
violence
disorder
different
impulsivity
preferences
27:00
buy
twizzlers
chocolate
preferences
entertainment
predispositions
if
16
lot
eat
need
neat
enjoy
purse
candy
tells
bunch
sugar
super
grams
value
thing
sugary
things
online
choice
control
looking
genetic
desires
average
27:30
actions
act
choice
question
flexibility
disaggregation
gun
try
mind
fire
cake
based
helps
hands
raise
turns
finds
number
things
answer
moment
desires
studies
actually
somewhat
maintain
compelled
significant
preferences
neuroscience
28:00
versus
choice
action
actions
freedom
difference
law
bad
brain
may
simply
across
theory
punish
control
desires
talking
choices
deciding
choosing
actually
separate
maintain
compatible
flexibility
preferences
28:30
brain
showed
matter
control
desires
preferences
may
gray
tumor
act
guy
kent
chose
large
people
things
regions
outside
lighten
account
talking
question
virginia
something
decreased
particular
psychopaths
29:00
law
neuroscience
supports
struggle
laughter
interesting
free
last
fact
raise
begin
issue
doctor
punish
robust
change
action
comment
concept
account
evidence
presents
29:30
defining
ago
act
brain
environmentally
differentiating
six
may
true
based
issue
today
terms
study
simply
define
months
genetic
desires
problem
committed
compelled
contextually
theoretically
distinguishing
Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)